Home
Search
........................................
Nichols Notes
Subscription
E-Mail Subscription Issues
Archives
........................................
Larry Nichols Live
........................................
About Larry
........................................
Contact Information
........................................
Internet TV
........................................

Unbelievable Automobile Prices!

REALLY LIVING HISTORY

As the new blockbuster book by Hillary Clinton is about to hit the bookstores I thought I would give you some historical events to look for if you decide to get the book. Of course the only events that I can relate to you are the ones that I actually was a part of. And I bet you will not find the history I was living very fondly portrayed by Hillary, if mentioned at all.

My history goes way back to Arkansas politics with the Clintons, but for purposes of this article let me start with the beginning of Bill Clinton's race for the Presidency in 1991. I know the election was in 1992, but he started in October of 1991 if my memory serves me correctly.

You see, my contribution to national history began on the same day that Bill Clinton's did, odd, as that may seem, unfortunately, it's true. The day Bill Clinton announced he was running for President he put me in the history books in national politics. He passed out press kits to all the national media showing why he was qualified to seek the highest office in the land. That certainly was normal for a candidate to do when seeking the office of President of the United States. What was historic about that day was the fact; he had his staff pass out another press kit to the media, a press kit they had never seen anyone, ever pass out before.

They handed each member of the national media a press kit on me as well. I was not running for President or any other office and the press kit they passed out wasn't meant to further my political career or any other type of career, for that matter. It was designed to discredit me. The plan was to discredit me, so that I could not discredit him. Anyway, that was the plan. What actually happened was that he caused me to make history that day. Bill Clinton's misguided effort, made it possible for me to be a part of every historic scandal during his historic terms in the office of Presidency. Go Figure!

What lesson can you pass on to your children about that faithful day in October 1991? Never try to control history. It will take care of itself. Above all, don't make me mad! I didn't and still do not care about history. I just care about the truth about what the Clinton's plan to do with this nation's future. Now go back and look at Bill Clinton's history as president and you will decide who won in the end?

Some say he did, some say I did. Bill Clinton will tell you history will remember him because he became President. I say history will remember him for his failed Presidency. He will say he won. I will say we all lost.

History was indeed made on that day in October 1991 and our nation still suffers from the shame brought forth by Bill Clinton and his rise to power and fame. It also suffers from my brief fifteen (15) minutes of fame. Don't worry, the Clinton's are back with their lust for power and as for me, my fifteen (15) minutes, well it looks like its goanna be an hour. After all, since history is always written by the victor, we will have to see who will lay claim to writing it.

WHO WON THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEBATE

Several Democrats showed their stuff in the first debate of the Democratic primary for the 2004 Presidential Campaign. The question is who won? Was it Kerry, Gephardt or even Sharpton or one of the others at the event? To be honest, I don't even know how many were there or all of their names, why, because I didn't watch. You know what? Neither did you! Maybe some of you did, but I can assure you the majority of the people did not see the debate.

Here comes the part that will be hard for you to believe, I am going to tell you who won. Impossible, not hardly! If you know what you didn't see! In case you want to know why you missed seeing what you didn't see is because you were looking at the toilet paper in the tree instead of watching the ground and where you were about to step. Let me explain how and why you were looking up instead of down and fell sucker to the parlor trick.

Early primaries are about "FRAME TIME" and very little more. Early debates are a chance for candidates to expose their image and message to the American Electorates. Hopefully, their image and message can strike a sympathetic cord with the public and more importantly with the national media. If they do not connect, their handlers can adjust their package and hope they can do better in the next debate. This process is called "FRAME TIME." So who won the battle of "FRAME TIME" in this debate? Hold on, not so fast!

ABC television network sponsored the debate and they used George Stephanopoulos, (better known from the old days of the Clinton administration as George Step-on-all-of-us,) as the moderator. Terry McAuliffe, the head of the Democratic National Committee, paid for much of the event. This combination did their job very well and made sure the "FRAME TIME" was appropriately handled to assure the Democratic Party that it would field the best candidate to face President Bush in the general election of 2004.

NOW FOR A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY

To begin, ABC was used often in my struggle of getting the truth out to the American people about Bill Clinton. The trick here is that I said they were used often in my struggle, but they didn't help me get the truth out about Clinton. They were actually used to discredit me and the truth about the scandals that I released about Clintons. George Step-on-all-of-us was used during the Bill Clinton era as the "spin mister" to conduct damage control of the scandals. He was to strong arm the media to make sure the scandals were not publicized. If the scandals got out anyway, he would develop the response and use the media to sway the public to their spin versus the truth. He was later placed at ABC to cover Bill Clinton after he left office. Now you should be able to see the strong ties ABC and George Stephanopoulos had and have with the Clinton's.

Terry McAuliffe was hand picked by the Clinton's to head the Democratic National Committee because that position controls the party's money. Therefore, plays a major role in choosing the person that the Democrats select as the final winner to face Bush. In short, the Clinton's control him, so they have control of the Democratic Party.

Back to my original question, who won the battle during the debate of "FRAME TIME?" Hillary Clinton was the big winner. No, she was not in the debate. Nor is she a candidate as yet, but she was still the big winner of the "FRAME TIME." As the yet un-announced Hillary Clinton, to be soon drafted in the race as a candidate and with the help of the (FOBAH) short for friends of Bill & Hillary masterfully took complete advantage of "FRAME TIME" to make sure it worked for her benefit and no one else.

Hillary has a unique position in her party's race to pick a candidate to square off against President Bush in 2004. She needs to stay out of the race for now to save her money and her campaign until later. Why? She knows she's got the "nod" if she wants it, so why run, or at least why get in one second before she needs to. When she gets in the race she would become the obvious front-runner. At that time she would be subjected to all of the lesser candidates taking pot shots at her and then running the risk of inflicting injuries that could cause her trouble in the general election. Everyday she cannot be in the race and still be way ahead of anyone else in the "pack" is money in the bank. This strategy clearly increases her viability as the true power in the Democratic Party and will better position her to the public and the media as a sure winner over President Bush.

Hillary Clinton at present does not want or need "FRAME TIME." Just by not getting in the race, as yet, and by not having to be a part of the early primaries, she is assured, she will not get any. That should seem easy enough, but there is a risk in this strategy. She does not want "FRAME TIME." She has to make sure that none of the lesser candidates have it either. You see, they might catch on with the public. They may become so powerful that she might not be needed by the Democratic Party, to save the day, as the only person the Democratic Party has to face and defeat President Bush.

It is a "tight rope" that she must walk very carefully or she can lose this moment for her to become President. The problem with this is that if they lose this moment they will lose their dream for ultimate power forever. The problem with this strategy is that no one on the planet knows this more than Bill & Hillary Clinton. With this realization, we must know that now we have the biggest problem of all. The Clintons.

IS CAMPAIGN FRAUD STILL ILLEGAL ANYMORE

I bring up the issue of "Campaign Fraud" and whether or not it is still illegal. I was being interviewed by Barbara Ketay on the Sunshine Radio Network on Friday, May 9, 2003 when this subject came up. Somehow, we got on the subject of my earlier article about the South Carolina debate and how ABC, George Stephanopoulos and the head of the Democratic National Committee rigged the debate to make sure that it benefited Hillary Clinton and not the candidates that participated.

Barbara led us into this conversation by mentioning that during the Nuremberg Trials after World War II that Hitler's Propaganda Minister was tried alongside other Hitler notables for war crimes. His actions were found to be equally culpable (deserving blame) for causing deaths to thousands during that war just like Hitler's other henchmen. Hence, the inspiration for this article, and here it goes!

The primacy is, if I do anything to fix, or rig the outcome of an election, I have committed a very serious crime. In trying to pull off this dastardly crime, if I meet and plan a crime with others, everyone taking part in the meeting could be charged with conspiracy to commit Campaign Election Fraud. I guess the problems caused by this potential crime and the punishment that would come if found guilty, is the reason most people don't even think about such an act. I said most people, but the Clinton's and company don't fall in the category of most people. As a matter of fact, most people wouldn't dare to try a trick like this. The guaranteed is the Clinton's will and are doing it.

As you may have figured out by now, the Clinton's don't have to live by the same laws, as we do. They have proven that many times. Remember, White Water, Filegate and too many other investigations to mention here? The Clinton's know they are above the law. They know they can do and have done, whatever they need to do, to obtain power and cover up anything they have done to keep it. That is pretty impressive, when you just think about it. Quite an accomplishment for the Clinton's, but it is disastrous to our country and the future for our children.

It must stop and it must stop now. We are going to have to do it. The question is, who will be the "we" that I'm referring to, and how will it be done? Tough part is proving it. Sound hard, it's "a piece of cake" against regular citizens of the country. The problem in this case, is that this time we're talking about the Clinton Aristocracy. They know they are above the law and we, the people of this country, should know it too.

It is coming, Campaign Election Fraud and Conspiracy to commit Campaign Election Fraud. South Carolina will be the place for the Primary debate for the Democratic Party's election of a Presidential candidate, for the general Presidential Election of 2004. The participants, ABC Television Network, George Stephanopoulos, Terry McAuliffe, various leaders of the Democratic Committee, various members of the South Carolina Democratic Party, Bill and Hillary Clinton and various Hillary Clinton Senate Staffers and various Hillary Clinton for President 2004 campaign staffers and exploratory committee executives and staffers.

Now will we prove it? How and who will we get to prosecute it? I would answer that NOW, but I have been warned by my "Nichols Notes" bosses that this issue is getting too long, so I'll save the rest for the next week issue, see ya then!

Thought for the week

One of the main causes of stress, fatigue and conflict is that most people do not know their purpose in life and try to do too much.

To subscribe to Nichols Notes please send a blank email to subscribe@larrynichols.com with SUBSCRIBE in the subject.

To be removed from Nichols Notes, send a BLANK email to remove@larrynichols.com with REMOVE in the subject line.